Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ºÒ·® ÀûÇÕ ÀÓÇöõÆ® º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ ±¤Åº¼º ÀÀ·Â ºÐ¼®

A photoelastic Stress Analysis of Implant Prosthesis According to Fitness of Super structure

±¸°­È¸º¹ÀÀ¿ë°úÇÐÁö 2010³â 26±Ç 1È£ p.39 ~ 46
ÀÓÇöÇÊ, Çã½Å¿Á, ±èÈ«ÁÖ, ¹Ú»ó¿ø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÓÇöÇÊ ( Lim Hyun-Phil ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Çã½Å¿Á ( Heo Shin-Ok ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±èÈ«ÁÖ ( Kim Hong-Joo ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
¹Ú»ó¿ø ( Park Sang-Won ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇÐÀü¹®´ëÇпø º¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract

ÀÓÇöõÆ® º¸Ã¶¹°¿¡ ÀǵµÀûÀ¸·Î ºÒ·® ÀûÇÕÀ» ºÎ¿©ÇÏ°í, ¼öÁ÷ ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÑ ÈÄ ÁÖº¯°ñ¿¡ ¹ß»ýµÇ´Â ÀÀ·ÂÀÇ ºÐÆ÷¸¦ ±¤Åº¼º ¸ðµ¨À» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© ºñ±³ ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ±¤Åº¼º ·¹Áøºí·Ï 3°³¸¦ Á¦ÀÛÇÏ°í °¢°¢¿¡ 3°³ÀÇ Restore¨Þ 4.0 x 10 mm ÀÓÇöõÆ®¸¦ ½Ä¸³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ëÁ¶±ºÀº ºÎÀûÇÕÀÌ ¾øµµ·Ï Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´°í, ½ÇÇ豺Àº °¢°¢ÀÇ ±Ý°üÀ» Àý´ÜÇÏ¿© 100§­ÀÇ ºÎÀûÇÕÀ» ºÎ¿©ÇÑ ÈÄ ±¤Åº¼º ÀÀ·ÂºÐ¼®À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù.
´ëÁ¶±ºÀÇ °æ¿ì ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¸é ÀÀ·Â ÁýÁßÀ» º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÏ´õ¶óµµ ±× ºÎÀ§¸¸ ÀÀ·Â ÁýÁßÀ» º¸¿´°í, Áß°£¿¡ ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡Çϸé ÀüÈĹæÀ¸·Î ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ ºÐ»êµÇ´Â ¾ç»óÀ» º¸¿´´Ù. ÀǵµÀûÀ¸·Î ºÎÀûÇÕÀ» ºÎ¿©ÇÑ °æ¿ì ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´õ¶óµµ ³ª»ç¸¦ Á¶ÀÌ¸é °íÁ¤Ã¼ ÁÖÀ§¿¡ ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇß°í, ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÑ °æ¿ì ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÑ ºÎÀ§¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ¿© ÁÖº¯ ÀÓÇöõÆ®¿¡µµ ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ ÁýÁߵǾú´Ù. ƯÈ÷, UCLA·Î Á¦ÀÛµÈ º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÌ ¿øÃßÇü Áß°£ Áö´ëÁÖ¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ °æ¿ì¿¡ ºñÇØ ´õ¿í ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ ÁýÁߵǾú´Âµ¥, Ä¡±Ù´Ü¿¡¼­ ½ÃÀÛÇÏ¿© Ä¡ÃàÀ» µû¶ó Ä¡°æºÎ±îÁö ÁýÁߵǾú´Ù. º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ ÀûÇÕµµ°¡ ÁÁÁö ¾ÊÀº °æ¿ì ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´õ¶óµµ ÀÀ·ÂÀÌ ÁýÁߵǸç, ÇÏÁßÀ» °¡ÇÒ °æ¿ì ´õ¿í ½ÉÇÑ ÀÀ·Â ÁýÁß ¾ç»óÀ» º¸Àδٴ Á¡Àº Á¤È®ÇÑ º¸Ã¶¹° Á¦ÀÛÀÇ Á߿伺À» ¸»ÇÏ°í ÀÖ´Ù.

To assess the stress distribution of implant prosthesis induced by intentional misfit using photoelastic model. Stress was
measured at the surrounding bone after applying vertical load to the implant. Three implants were placed in each of three
photoelastic resin blocks. No misfits were used for the control group, while for the experimental group 100¥ìm misfit after
cutting the crown was used. The photoelastic stress analysis was performed. In control group, stress concentration was not shown when the load was not applied, whereas stress concentration was shown only in the loaded part even when load was applied and the stress was distributed in anterior-posterior direction when applying a load in the middle. When
intentional misfits were given, stress around the fixture was incurred when tightening the screw even if load was not
applied. If the load was applied, stress was concentrated around the implants including areas where the load was applied.
In particular, the prosthesis made of UCLA showed more stress concentration as compared with a conical abutment. In
the UCLA case, concentration was shown from the apex following through the axis to the cervical area. Prosthesis with
misfit makes the stress concentrated though the load was not applied and it induces even more severe stress concentration when the load was applied. This founding demonstrates the importance of the correct prosthesis production.

Å°¿öµå

ÀÓÇöõÆ® º¸Ã¶¹°ÀÇ ÀûÇÕµµ;±¤Åº¼º ÀÀ·ÂºÐ¼®
implant fitness;photoelastic stress analysis

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI